浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
中航通飞研究院有限公司,珠海,519040
Published:2017
移动端阅览
郝晓宁. 激光增材制造毛坯与传统锻件铸件差异性分析[J]. 航空制造技术, 2017, 60(5): 82-86.
HAO Xiaoning . Difference Analysis Between Laser Additive Manufacturing and Conventional Forging and Casting. Aeronautical Manufacturing Technology, 2017, 60(5): 82-86.
郝晓宁. 激光增材制造毛坯与传统锻件铸件差异性分析[J]. 航空制造技术, 2017, 60(5): 82-86. DOI: 10.16080/j.issn1671-833x.2017.05.082.
HAO Xiaoning . Difference Analysis Between Laser Additive Manufacturing and Conventional Forging and Casting. Aeronautical Manufacturing Technology, 2017, 60(5): 82-86. DOI: 10.16080/j.issn1671-833x.2017.05.082.
通过收集和整理国内外技术标准,对比分析了激光增材制造毛坯与传统锻造和铸造毛坯在成形工艺、显微组织、缺陷及其形成原因、内部质量以及力学性能等方面的差异。结果表明,激光增材制造较传统工艺整体制造周期短、材料利用率高;激光增材制造毛坯气孔能达到A1 级别,稍低于锻造的AA 级别,气孔级别能达到铸件的B 级;激光增材制造钛合金纵横向屈服强度和拉伸强度分别比锻造和铸造低3.4% 和0.78%。
After collecting and sorting the domestic and foreign standards
we analyzed the differences between laser additive manufacturing (LAM) and the conventional forging and casting in forming technology
microstructure
defects and the causes
internal quality and mechanical properties. It revealed that compared with conventional forming and casting
the manufacturing cycle of LAM is shorter and the material utilization is higher; the porosity in the blank fabricated by LAM can reach class A1
which is lower than forging class AA. Compared with casting
porosity can reach class B. Yield strength of titanium alloy by LAM in transverse and horizontal are lower than forging and casting by 3.4%
and tensile strength that of forging and casting by 0.78% respectively.
0
Views
729
下载量
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution