HFQ)中,直接在固溶温度进行成形难以实现板材最佳成形性能,容易产生开裂等成形缺陷。针对这一问题,在板材固溶后引入预冷处理,即通过使固溶板材降温到设计目标温度再进行塑性成形,旨在实现铝合金高强薄壁零件的成形成性。针对一种改进 AA7055 高强铝合金板材,在其淬火敏感温度区间内,进行了固溶后不同预冷温度条件下的力学性能测试,结果表明,在 350℃预冷温度下板材延伸率最大,成形性最好。以典型特征结构件为对象,对该材料进行了预冷条件下的 HFQ 工艺成形试验,获得了不同预冷条件及原始板料成形的影响规律。发现该种铝合金的 F 态(自由加工态)板料比 O 态板料表面质量更好,在相同预冷 HFQ 工艺下成形性更高,进一步对 F 态坯料进行传统 HFQ 对比成形试验后发现,在无预冷时 F 态板料成形破裂严重。对成形零件典型位置进行取样和性能测试,试验结果表明,由于 350℃ 预冷温度在材料鼻尖温度附近,成形件抗拉强度恶化最为严重。为兼顾成形性与强度,预冷温度选择 400℃为宜。
Abstract
For high-strength aluminum alloys at the solution temperature
it is difficult to achieve the best formability during the hot stamping and cold die quenching process (heat treatment
forming and in-die quenching
HFQ)
and forming defects such as cracks would occur easily. To solve this problem
this paper introduces a pre-cooling treatment
which could cool the solid solution sheet to target temperature. In the quenching sensitivity temperature range
the mechanical properties of an AA7055 high-strength aluminum alloy sheet were tested under different pre-cooling temperatures after solid solution. It is found that the largest elongation and the best formability are obtained at pre-cooling temperature of 350℃. Taking structural parts with typical characteristics as an example
the HFQ process tests with different pre-cooling conditions and original sheet materials were carried out. It is found that the surface quality of the F–state sheet is better than that of the O–state one
and F-state sheet has better formability under the same process flow. The traditional HFQ comparative forming experiment was carried out on the F–state sheet
and the F–state sheet was severely broken without pre-cooling treatment. The uniaxial tensile tests were carried out on the typical positions of the well-formed parts. And it proves that the strength of the formed part is the lowest at the pre-cooling temperature of 350℃
which is near the nose tip temperature for quenching sensitivity. Taking into account the formability and strength