1. 中国航发北京航空材料研究院,北京,100095
2. 航空工业陕西宏远航空锻造有限责任公司,西安,713801
3. 中国航发商用航空发动机有限责任公司,上海,200241
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
张明达,曹京霞,周毅,邓瑞刚,史栋钢,黄旭. Ti6242合金微观组织差异及其演变对拉伸和疲劳性能影响[J]. 航空制造技术, 2021, 64(1/2): 14-20. ZHANG Mingda,CAO Jingxia,ZHOU Yi,DENG Ruigang,SHI Donggang,HUANG Xu. Effects of Microstructure Difference and Evolution on Tensile and Fatigue Properties of Ti6242 Alloy. Aeronautical Manufacturing Technology, 2021, 64(1/2): 14-20.
ZHANG Mingda, CAO Jingxia, ZHOU Yi, et al. Effects of Microstructure Difference and Evolution on Tensile and Fatigue Properties of Ti6242 Alloy[J]. Aeronautical Manufacturing Technology, 2021, 64(1/2).
张明达,曹京霞,周毅,邓瑞刚,史栋钢,黄旭. Ti6242合金微观组织差异及其演变对拉伸和疲劳性能影响[J]. 航空制造技术, 2021, 64(1/2): 14-20. ZHANG Mingda,CAO Jingxia,ZHOU Yi,DENG Ruigang,SHI Donggang,HUANG Xu. Effects of Microstructure Difference and Evolution on Tensile and Fatigue Properties of Ti6242 Alloy. Aeronautical Manufacturing Technology, 2021, 64(1/2): 14-20. DOI: 10.16080/j.issn1671-833x.2021.01/02.014.
ZHANG Mingda, CAO Jingxia, ZHOU Yi, et al. Effects of Microstructure Difference and Evolution on Tensile and Fatigue Properties of Ti6242 Alloy[J]. Aeronautical Manufacturing Technology, 2021, 64(1/2). DOI: 10.16080/j.issn1671-833x.2021.01/02.014.
典型近 α 型钛合金 Ti6242 合金制备盘锻件的综合力学性能与其棒材原始微观组织特征密切相关。本研究选取具有明显微观组织特征差别的 3 种 Ti6242 钛合金棒材为研究对象,定量化评估不同 Ti6242 钛合金棒材锻造态、固溶态和固溶 + 时效态的微观组织差别和演变规律,并讨论棒材微观组织差别和演变对综合力学性能的影响。研究结果显示具有明显差别的不同棒材微观组织在经历相同的固溶和时效处理后,其初生 α 相体积分数差别趋于相近,而初生 α 相的尺寸分布和形状分布等微观组织特征仍保留差别;力学性能结果显示室温拉伸力学性能趋于近似,而低周疲劳和保载疲劳力学性能对微观组织特征较为敏感。对比不同特征组织和力学性能分析结果,具有细小非等轴状且没有明显取向集中分布初生 α 相的棒材原始组织有助于获得更好的疲劳性能。
The mechanical properties of the near-alpha titanium alloys Ti6242 alloy disc forgings usually have close relationship with the original microstructure of bars. In this study
three kinds of Ti6242 alloy bars with different original microstructure were selected to quantitatively analyze the difference and evolution of different microstructure characteristics
including the forged state
the solid solution state and the solid solution and aging state. The effects of the microstructure difference and evolution on the mechanical properties were also compared. The results showed that the differences of primary α phase volume fraction reduced after similar solid solution and aging treatment process
while the sectional area distribution and shape distribution of primary α phase still retained some differences. Room temperature tensile mechanical properties showed no significant difference
while the low fatigue property and dwell fatigue property exhibited significant difference. According to the microstructure difference analysis and mechanical property results
the original microstructure of bar with fine
non-equiaxed and no obvious orientation primary alpha phase contributed to good fatigue properties.
0
浏览量
317
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621
